We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check out the original issue: uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues#780
Here's what we should do:
Additionally to implementing this in AdGuard Home, we should do the following:
dnsproxy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just in case the following is overlooked.. It would be good if this goes through the whole CNAME chain. I.e.
ad.firstparty.com cname unblocked.company2.com unblocked.company2.com cname blocked.adcompany.com blocked.adcompany.com
This request should be blocked if either unblocked.company2.com or blocked.adcompany.com is blocked.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@hoshsadiq all CNAME records in the chain will be present in the recursor's response so this is not a problem:
$ nslookup test2.meshkov.info Server: 2001:db8:7c02:1::1 Address: 2001:db8:7c02:1::1#53 Non-authoritative answer: test2.meshkov.info canonical name = test1.meshkov.info. test1.meshkov.info canonical name = example.org. Name: example.org Address: 93.184.216.34
Aah! Perfect!
07a9c3b
IldarKamalov
szolin
No branches or pull requests
Check out the original issue:
uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues#780
Here's what we should do:
Additionally to implementing this in AdGuard Home, we should do the following:
dnsproxy
's mobile APIThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: