We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please consider this as an enhancement.
CNAME cloaking is in place to bypass tracking list. Please do go through this article - https://medium.com/nextdns/cname-cloaking-the-dangerous-disguise-of-third-party-trackers-195205dc522a
uBlock Origin Firefox extension is configuring a DNS lookup to prevent such tracking. See; uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues#780 gorhill/uBlock@3a564c1
Is AdGuard protected from such bypass procedures? Is using AdGuard DoH service sufficient to stop such tracking?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Closing this as I found a AdGuard blog post and twitter entry which mentions that AdGuard DNS blocks CNAME cloaking.
https://adguard.com/en/blog/disguised-trackers.html
https://twitter.com/ay_meshkov/status/1197931395533955072
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Please consider this as an enhancement.
CNAME cloaking is in place to bypass tracking list. Please do go through this article - https://medium.com/nextdns/cname-cloaking-the-dangerous-disguise-of-third-party-trackers-195205dc522a
uBlock Origin Firefox extension is configuring a DNS lookup to prevent such tracking. See;
uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues#780
gorhill/uBlock@3a564c1
Is AdGuard protected from such bypass procedures? Is using AdGuard DoH service sufficient to stop such tracking?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: