-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 595
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switch from m-scr-p and m-bundle-p to bnd-m-p #2761
Conversation
entry = zis.getNextEntry(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
// metatype descriptors must come last (after component descriptions) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@justinedelson Any reason why you think that metatype attributes should overwrite the value of same named component properties? IMHO those two are not directly related. Currently it feels a bit like we a comparing apples and pears. The correct way would be to compare SCR descriptors and metatype descriptors separately, as one affects the default properties of DS components, the other one only how the Felix Web Console renders a UI for setting custom properties.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This may easily lead to false positives e.g. in case you change the component property to another type while keeping the metatype with the previous type.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2761 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 53.79%
Complexity ? 5528
=========================================
Files ? 752
Lines ? 30455
Branches ? 3936
=========================================
Hits ? 16383
Misses ? 12545
Partials ? 1527
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
7c88e0d
to
31f954c
Compare
This closes #1718 Still WIP
make ScrMetadataIT more robust by not relying on order in JAR ease debugging by prefixing property values coming from metatype with "(metatype)"
31f954c
to
7f4544b
Compare
@davidjgonzalez Can you review? I would like to merge soon... |
This closes #1718