Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Content policy injector #3305

Conversation

niekraaijmakers
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 46 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.34%. Comparing base (422ca5f) to head (5454ac4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
...s/via/impl/ContentPolicyPropertiesViaProvider.java 0.00% 20 Missing ⚠️
...s/commons/models/injectors/impl/InjectorUtils.java 0.00% 11 Missing ⚠️
.../ContentPolicyValueAnnotationProcessorFactory.java 0.00% 9 Missing ⚠️
...els/injectors/impl/ContentPolicyValueInjector.java 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3305      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     55.42%   55.34%   -0.09%     
  Complexity     5529     5529              
============================================
  Files           723      726       +3     
  Lines         29623    29669      +46     
  Branches       3858     3868      +10     
============================================
  Hits          16419    16419              
- Misses        11663    11709      +46     
  Partials       1541     1541              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@davidjgonzalez davidjgonzalez merged commit 4105c3c into Adobe-Consulting-Services:master Apr 2, 2024
19 of 20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants