Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement definitions for module uxp->storage #14

Closed
pklaschka opened this issue Aug 9, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #17
Closed

Implement definitions for module uxp->storage #14

pklaschka opened this issue Aug 9, 2018 · 4 comments · Fixed by #17
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@pklaschka
Copy link
Contributor

Documentation:
https://adobe-xd.gitbook.io/plugin-api-reference/uxp-api-reference/storage-apis/storage

@pklaschka pklaschka added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Aug 9, 2018
@pklaschka
Copy link
Contributor Author

pklaschka commented Aug 9, 2018

@morsh (or anyone else willing to contribute) Have you – by any chance – worked with the storage module before? Since I (unfortunately) haven't, it would take a while for me to familiarize myself with the module. Any help would be welcome 😄

@pklaschka pklaschka self-assigned this Aug 10, 2018
@pklaschka
Copy link
Contributor Author

pklaschka commented Aug 10, 2018

I'll implement definitions for the parts I already understand – we'll see how far I get 😄

@morsh
Copy link

morsh commented Aug 12, 2018

@pklaschka - I've ended up using the great work you've done, it was sufficient for me to start working

@pklaschka
Copy link
Contributor Author

I just got confirmation on a question so I can continue working on this and I'll (hopefully) be able to pull this into the master branch tomorrow 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants