Kernel build is broken #3

ra1nst0rm3d · 2021-09-09T20:10:07Z

While building with latest Google's Clang and Binutils for AArch64, kernel causes so many errors related to header files...
Are ur kernel build okay?

commit 438553958ba19296663c6d6583d208dfb6792830 upstream. The ordering of MSI-X enable in hardware is dysfunctional: 1) MSI-X is disabled in the control register 2) Various setup functions 3) pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs() is invoked which ends up accessing the MSI-X table entries 4) MSI-X is enabled and masked in the control register with the comment that enabling is required for some hardware to access the MSI-X table Step AgentFabulous#4 obviously contradicts AgentFabulous#3. The history of this is an issue with the NIU hardware. When AgentFabulous#4 was introduced the table access actually happened in msix_program_entries() which was invoked after enabling and masking MSI-X. This was changed in commit d71d643 ("PCI/MSI: Kill redundant call of irq_set_msi_desc() for MSI-X interrupts") which removed the table write from msix_program_entries(). Interestingly enough nobody noticed and either NIU still works or it did not get any testing with a kernel 3.19 or later. Nevertheless this is inconsistent and there is no reason why MSI-X can't be enabled and masked in the control register early on, i.e. move step AgentFabulous#4 above to step AgentFabulous#1. This preserves the NIU workaround and has no side effects on other hardware. Fixes: d71d643 ("PCI/MSI: Kill redundant call of irq_set_msi_desc() for MSI-X interrupts") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210729222542.344136412@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit d26383dcb2b4b8629fde05270b4e3633be9e3d4b ] The following leaks were detected by ASAN: Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e) AgentFabulous#1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333 AgentFabulous#2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59 AgentFabulous#3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73 AgentFabulous#4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155 AgentFabulous#5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410 AgentFabulous#6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440 AgentFabulous#7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661 AgentFabulous#8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807 AgentFabulous#9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312 #10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364 #11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408 #12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538 #13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308 Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200915031819.386559-12-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit b872d0640840018669032b20b6375a478ed1f923 ] The vfio_pci_release call will free and clear the error and request eventfd ctx while these ctx could be in use at the same time in the function like vfio_pci_request, and it's expected to protect them under the vdev->igate mutex, which is missing in vfio_pci_release. This issue is introduced since commit 1518ac272e78 ("vfio/pci: fix memory leaks of eventfd ctx"),and since commit 5c5866c593bb ("vfio/pci: Clear error and request eventfd ctx after releasing"), it's very easily to trigger the kernel panic like this: [ 9513.904346] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008 [ 9513.913091] Mem abort info: [ 9513.915871] ESR = 0x96000006 [ 9513.918912] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 9513.924198] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 9513.927238] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 9513.930364] Data abort info: [ 9513.933231] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006 [ 9513.937048] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 9513.940003] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000007ec7d12000 [ 9513.946414] [0000000000000008] pgd=0000007ec7d13003, p4d=0000007ec7d13003, pud=0000007ec728c003, pmd=0000000000000000 [ 9513.956975] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [AgentFabulous#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 9513.962521] Modules linked in: vfio_pci vfio_virqfd vfio_iommu_type1 vfio hclge hns3 hnae3 [last unloaded: vfio_pci] [ 9513.972998] CPU: 4 PID: 1327 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.8.0-rc4+ AgentFabulous#3 [ 9513.980443] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V3.B270.01 05/08/2020 [ 9513.989274] pstate: 80400089 (Nzcv daIf +PAN -UAO BTYPE=--) [ 9513.994827] pc : _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x88 [ 9513.999515] lr : eventfd_signal+0x6c/0x1b0 [ 9514.003591] sp : ffff800038a0b960 [ 9514.006889] x29: ffff800038a0b960 x28: ffff007ef7f4da10 [ 9514.012175] x27: ffff207eefbbfc80 x26: ffffbb7903457000 [ 9514.017462] x25: ffffbb7912191000 x24: ffff007ef7f4d400 [ 9514.022747] x23: ffff20be6e0e4c00 x22: 0000000000000008 [ 9514.028033] x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000 [ 9514.033321] x19: 0000000000000008 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 9514.038606] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffbb7910029328 [ 9514.043893] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000001 [ 9514.049179] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000002 [ 9514.054466] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000a00 [ 9514.059752] x9 : ffff800038a0b840 x8 : ffff007ef7f4de60 [ 9514.065038] x7 : ffff007fffc96690 x6 : fffffe01faffb748 [ 9514.070324] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 9514.075609] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000001 [ 9514.080895] x1 : ffff007ef7f4d400 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 9514.086181] Call trace: [ 9514.088618] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x88 [ 9514.092954] eventfd_signal+0x6c/0x1b0 [ 9514.096691] vfio_pci_request+0x84/0xd0 [vfio_pci] [ 9514.101464] vfio_del_group_dev+0x150/0x290 [vfio] [ 9514.106234] vfio_pci_remove+0x30/0x128 [vfio_pci] [ 9514.111007] pci_device_remove+0x48/0x108 [ 9514.115001] device_release_driver_internal+0x100/0x1b8 [ 9514.120200] device_release_driver+0x28/0x38 [ 9514.124452] pci_stop_bus_device+0x68/0xa8 [ 9514.128528] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x20/0x38 [ 9514.133557] pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0xb4/0x128 [ 9514.137893] sriov_disable+0x3c/0x108 [ 9514.141538] pci_disable_sriov+0x28/0x38 [ 9514.145445] hns3_pci_sriov_configure+0x48/0xb8 [hns3] [ 9514.150558] sriov_numvfs_store+0x110/0x198 [ 9514.154724] dev_attr_store+0x44/0x60 [ 9514.158373] sysfs_kf_write+0x5c/0x78 [ 9514.162018] kernfs_fop_write+0x104/0x210 [ 9514.166010] __vfs_write+0x48/0x90 [ 9514.169395] vfs_write+0xbc/0x1c0 [ 9514.172694] ksys_write+0x74/0x100 [ 9514.176079] __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x30 [ 9514.179987] el0_svc_common.constprop.4+0x110/0x200 [ 9514.184842] do_el0_svc+0x34/0x98 [ 9514.188144] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 9514.191185] el0_sync_handler+0xb0/0x2d0 [ 9514.195088] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 9514.198389] Code: b9001020 d2800000 52800022 f9800271 (885ffe61) [ 9514.204455] ---[ end trace 648de00c8406465f ]--- [ 9514.212308] note: bash[1327] exited with preempt_count 1 Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Fixes: 1518ac272e78 ("vfio/pci: fix memory leaks of eventfd ctx") Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

@offset

commit 64b7f674c292207624b3d788eda2dde3dc1415df upstream. On setxattr() syscall path due to an apprent typo the size of a dynamically allocated memory chunk for storing struct smb2_file_full_ea_info object is computed incorrectly, to be more precise the first addend is the size of a pointer instead of the wanted object size. Coincidentally it makes no difference on 64-bit platforms, however on 32-bit targets the following memcpy() writes 4 bytes of data outside of the dynamically allocated memory. ============================================================================= BUG kmalloc-16 (Not tainted): Redzone overwritten ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint INFO: 0x79e69a6f-0x9e5cdecf @offset=368. First byte 0x73 instead of 0xcc INFO: Slab 0xd36d2454 objects=85 used=51 fp=0xf7d0fc7a flags=0x35000201 INFO: Object 0x6f171df3 @offset=352 fp=0x00000000 Redzone 5d4ff02d: cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc ................ Object 6f171df3: 00 00 00 00 00 05 06 00 73 6e 72 75 62 00 66 69 ........snrub.fi Redzone 79e69a6f: 73 68 32 0a sh2. Padding 56254d82: 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ZZZZZZZZ CPU: 0 PID: 8196 Comm: attr Tainted: G B 5.9.0-rc8+ AgentFabulous#3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x54/0x6e print_trailer+0x12c/0x134 check_bytes_and_report.cold+0x3e/0x69 check_object+0x18c/0x250 free_debug_processing+0xfe/0x230 __slab_free+0x1c0/0x300 kfree+0x1d3/0x220 smb2_set_ea+0x27d/0x540 cifs_xattr_set+0x57f/0x620 __vfs_setxattr+0x4e/0x60 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x4e/0x100 __vfs_setxattr_locked+0xae/0xd0 vfs_setxattr+0x4e/0xe0 setxattr+0x12c/0x1a0 path_setxattr+0xa4/0xc0 __ia32_sys_lsetxattr+0x1d/0x20 __do_fast_syscall_32+0x40/0x70 do_fast_syscall_32+0x29/0x60 do_SYSENTER_32+0x15/0x20 entry_SYSENTER_32+0x9f/0xf2 Fixes: 5517554 ("cifs: Add support for writing attributes on SMB2+") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir@tuxera.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

[ Upstream commit 71a174b39f10b4b93223d374722aa894b5d8a82e ] b6da31b2c07c "tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag" puts tty_flip_buffer_push under port->lock introducing the following possible circular locking dependency: [30129.876566] ====================================================== [30129.876566] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [30129.876567] 5.9.0-rc2+ AgentFabulous#3 Tainted: G S W [30129.876568] ------------------------------------------------------ [30129.876568] sysrq.sh/1222 is trying to acquire lock: [30129.876569] ffffffff92c39480 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_unlock+0x3fe/0xa90 [30129.876572] but task is already holding lock: [30129.876572] ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876576] which lock already depends on the new lock. [30129.876577] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [30129.876578] -> AgentFabulous#3 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876581] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70 [30129.876581] __queue_work+0x1a3/0x10f0 [30129.876582] queue_work_on+0x78/0x80 [30129.876582] pty_write+0x165/0x1e0 [30129.876583] n_tty_write+0x47f/0xf00 [30129.876583] tty_write+0x3d6/0x8d0 [30129.876584] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876588] -> AgentFabulous#2 (&port->lock#2){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876590] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876591] tty_port_tty_get+0x1d/0xb0 [30129.876592] tty_port_default_wakeup+0xb/0x30 [30129.876592] serial8250_tx_chars+0x3d6/0x970 [30129.876593] serial8250_handle_irq.part.12+0x216/0x380 [30129.876593] serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x82/0xe0 [30129.876594] serial8250_interrupt+0xdd/0x1b0 [30129.876595] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xfc/0x850 [30129.876602] -> AgentFabulous#1 (&port->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: [30129.876605] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3b/0x80 [30129.876605] serial8250_console_write+0x12d/0x900 [30129.876606] console_unlock+0x679/0xa90 [30129.876606] register_console+0x371/0x6e0 [30129.876607] univ8250_console_init+0x24/0x27 [30129.876607] console_init+0x2f9/0x45e [30129.876609] -> #0 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}: [30129.876611] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876612] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876612] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876613] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876613] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876614] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876615] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876615] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876616] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876616] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876617] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 [30129.876619] other info that might help us debug this: [30129.876620] Chain exists of: [30129.876621] console_owner --> &port->lock#2 --> &pool->lock/1 [30129.876625] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [30129.876626] CPU0 CPU1 [30129.876626] ---- ---- [30129.876627] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876628] lock(&port->lock#2); [30129.876630] lock(&pool->lock/1); [30129.876631] lock(console_owner); [30129.876633] *** DEADLOCK *** [30129.876634] 5 locks held by sysrq.sh/1222: [30129.876634] #0: ffff8881d3ce0470 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x359/0x650 [30129.876637] AgentFabulous#1: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __handle_sysrq+0x4d/0x460 [30129.876640] AgentFabulous#2: ffffffff92c612c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: show_workqueue_state+0x5/0xf0 [30129.876642] AgentFabulous#3: ffff888107cb9018 (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x15b/0x6ca [30129.876645] AgentFabulous#4: ffffffff92c39980 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: vprintk_emit+0x123/0x420 [30129.876648] stack backtrace: [30129.876649] CPU: 3 PID: 1222 Comm: sysrq.sh Tainted: G S W 5.9.0-rc2+ AgentFabulous#3 [30129.876649] Hardware name: Intel Corporation 2012 Client Platform/Emerald Lake 2, BIOS ACRVMBY1.86C.0078.P00.1201161002 01/16/2012 [30129.876650] Call Trace: [30129.876650] dump_stack+0x9d/0xe0 [30129.876651] check_noncircular+0x34f/0x410 [30129.876653] __lock_acquire+0x2f70/0x4e90 [30129.876656] lock_acquire+0x1ac/0xad0 [30129.876658] console_unlock+0x460/0xa90 [30129.876660] vprintk_emit+0x130/0x420 [30129.876660] printk+0x9f/0xc5 [30129.876661] show_pwq+0x154/0x618 [30129.876662] show_workqueue_state.cold.55+0x193/0x6ca [30129.876664] __handle_sysrq+0x244/0x460 [30129.876665] write_sysrq_trigger+0x48/0x4a [30129.876665] proc_reg_write+0x1a6/0x240 [30129.876666] vfs_write+0x1a8/0x650 It looks like the commit was aimed to protect tty_insert_flip_string and there is no need for tty_flip_buffer_push to be under this lock. Fixes: b6da31b2c07c ("tty: Fix data race in tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902120045.3693075-1-asavkov@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit ca10845a56856fff4de3804c85e6424d0f6d0cde ] While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ AgentFabulous#4 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> AgentFabulous#3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> AgentFabulous#2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> AgentFabulous#1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 AgentFabulous#1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 AgentFabulous#2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ AgentFabulous#4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of adding in a new device. However we only need to hold the device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices devices. Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get rid of this lockdep splat. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x: f3cd2c58110dad14e: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit e773ca7da8beeca7f17fe4c9d1284a2b66839cc1 ] Actually, burst size is equal to '1 << desc->rqcfg.brst_size'. we should use burst size, not desc->rqcfg.brst_size. dma memcpy performance on Rockchip RV1126 @ 1512MHz A7, 1056MHz LPDDR3, 200MHz DMA: dmatest: /# echo dma0chan0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/channel /# echo 4194304 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/test_buf_size /# echo 8 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/iterations /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/norandom /# echo y > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/verbose /# echo 1 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result AgentFabulous#1: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result AgentFabulous#2: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result AgentFabulous#3: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result AgentFabulous#4: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result AgentFabulous#5: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result AgentFabulous#6: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result AgentFabulous#7: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: result AgentFabulous#8: 'test passed' with src_off=0x0 dst_off=0x0 len=0x400000 Before: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 48 iops 200338 KB/s (0) After this patch: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 179 iops 734873 KB/s (0) After this patch and increase dma clk to 400MHz: dmatest: dma0chan0-copy0: summary 8 tests, 0 failures 259 iops 1062929 KB/s (0) Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1605326106-55681-1-git-send-email-sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 4a9d81caf841cd2c0ae36abec9c2963bf21d0284 ] If the elem is deleted during be iterated on it, the iteration process will fall into an endless loop. kernel: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#4 stuck for 22s! [nfsd:17137] PID: 17137 TASK: ffff8818d93c0000 CPU: 4 COMMAND: "nfsd" [exception RIP: __state_in_grace+76] RIP: ffffffffc00e817c RSP: ffff8818d3aefc98 RFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: ffff881dc0c38298 RBX: ffffffff81b03580 RCX: ffff881dc02c9f50 RDX: ffff881e3fce8500 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff81b03580 RBP: ffff8818d3aefca0 R8: 0000000000000020 R9: ffff8818d3aefd40 R10: ffff88017fc03800 R11: ffff8818e83933c0 R12: ffff8818d3aefd40 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8818e8391068 R15: ffff8818fa6e4000 CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #0 [ffff8818d3aefc98] opens_in_grace at ffffffffc00e81e3 [grace] AgentFabulous#1 [ffff8818d3aefca8] nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op at ffffffffc02a3e6c [nfsd] AgentFabulous#2 [ffff8818d3aefd18] nfsd4_write at ffffffffc028ed5b [nfsd] AgentFabulous#3 [ffff8818d3aefd80] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffc0290a0d [nfsd] AgentFabulous#4 [ffff8818d3aefdd0] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffc027b800 [nfsd] AgentFabulous#5 [ffff8818d3aefe08] svc_process_common at ffffffffc02017f3 [sunrpc] AgentFabulous#6 [ffff8818d3aefe70] svc_process at ffffffffc0201ce3 [sunrpc] AgentFabulous#7 [ffff8818d3aefe98] nfsd at ffffffffc027b117 [nfsd] AgentFabulous#8 [ffff8818d3aefec8] kthread at ffffffff810b88c1 AgentFabulous#9 [ffff8818d3aeff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff816d1607 The troublemake elem: crash> lock_manager ffff881dc0c38298 struct lock_manager { list = { next = 0xffff881dc0c38298, prev = 0xffff881dc0c38298 }, block_opens = false } Fixes: c87fb4a ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens") Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit c5c97cadd7ed13381cb6b4bef5c841a66938d350 ] The ubsan reported the following error. It was because sample's raw data missed u32 padding at the end. So it broke the alignment of the array after it. The raw data contains an u32 size prefix so the data size should have an u32 padding after 8-byte aligned data. 27: Sample parsing :util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4: runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x62100006b9bc for type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'), which requires 8 byte alignment 0x62100006b9bc: note: pointer points here 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ^ #0 0x561532a9fc96 in perf_event__synthesize_sample util/synthetic-events.c:1539:13 AgentFabulous#1 0x5615327f4a4f in do_test tests/sample-parsing.c:284:8 AgentFabulous#2 0x5615327f3f50 in test__sample_parsing tests/sample-parsing.c:381:9 AgentFabulous#3 0x56153279d3a1 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:424:9 AgentFabulous#4 0x56153279c836 in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:454:9 AgentFabulous#5 0x56153279b7eb in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:675:4 AgentFabulous#6 0x56153279abf0 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:821:9 AgentFabulous#7 0x56153264e796 in run_builtin perf.c:312:11 AgentFabulous#8 0x56153264cf03 in handle_internal_command perf.c:364:8 AgentFabulous#9 0x56153264e47d in run_argv perf.c:408:2 #10 0x56153264c9a9 in main perf.c:538:3 #11 0x7f137ab6fbbc in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x38bbc) #12 0x561532596828 in _start ... SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: misaligned-pointer-use util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4 in Fixes: 045f8cd ("perf tests: Add a sample parsing test") Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210214091638.519643-1-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

Move the loop-invariant calculation of 'cpu' in do_idle() out of the loop body, because the current CPU is always constant. This improves the generated code both on x86-64 and ARM64: x86-64: Before patch (execution in loop): 864: 0f ae e8 lfence 867: 65 8b 05 c2 38 f1 7e mov %gs:0x7ef138c2(%rip),%eax 86e: 89 c0 mov %eax,%eax 870: 48 0f a3 05 68 19 08 bt %rax,0x1081968(%rip) 877: 01 After patch (execution in loop): 872: 0f ae e8 lfence 875: 4c 0f a3 25 63 19 08 bt %r12,0x1081963(%rip) 87c: 01 ARM64: Before patch (execution in loop): c58: d5033d9f dsb ld c5c: d538d080 mrs x0, tpidr_el1 c60: b8606a61 ldr w1, [x19,x0] c64: 1100fc20 add w0, w1, #0x3f c68: 7100003f cmp w1, #0x0 c6c: 1a81b000 csel w0, w0, w1, lt c70: 13067c00 asr w0, w0, AgentFabulous#6 c74: 93407c00 sxtw x0, w0 c78: f8607a80 ldr x0, [x20,x0,lsl AgentFabulous#3] c7c: 9ac12401 lsr x1, x0, x1 c80: 36000581 tbz w1, #0, d30 <do_idle+0x128> After patch (execution in loop): c84: d5033d9f dsb ld c88: f9400260 ldr x0, [x19] c8c: ea14001f tst x0, x20 c90: 54000580 b.eq d40 <do_idle+0x138> Signed-off-by: Cheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com> [ Rewrote the title and the changelog. ] Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: huawei.libin@huawei.com Cc: xiexiuqi@huawei.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508930907-107755-1-git-send-email-cj.chengjian@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Kernel build is broken #3

Kernel build is broken #3

ra1nst0rm3d commented Sep 9, 2021

Kernel build is broken #3

Kernel build is broken #3

Comments

ra1nst0rm3d commented Sep 9, 2021