You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
MIxS has the key "drainage_class", to represent USDA drainage classes, with the following value set: [very poorly|poorly|somewhat poorly|moderately well|well|excessively drained|somewhat excessively] as defined here by USDA.
Should these be subclassed as "physical quality" of soil?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Adding generic qualitative measures is not recommended practice. It's better to use quantitative results to measure drainage than to describe a process using weak categorical labels. If for instance we had an universally accepted range to define 'poorly' and 'moderately well', then it would warrant additional consideration.
Please reopen the issue if you have additional points to consider and we can discuss further. Apologies for the delay.
MIxS has the key "drainage_class", to represent USDA drainage classes, with the following value set: [very poorly|poorly|somewhat poorly|moderately well|well|excessively drained|somewhat excessively] as defined here by USDA.
Should these be subclassed as "physical quality" of soil?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: