Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to gcc register format #124

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 9, 2023
Merged

Switch to gcc register format #124

merged 2 commits into from
May 9, 2023

Conversation

Alan-Jowett
Copy link
Owner

@Alan-Jowett Alan-Jowett commented May 8, 2023

GCC prefixes names with %. Switch over to using % as a name prefix to match GCC.

Resolves: #123

Alan Jowett and others added 2 commits May 8, 2023 11:26
Signed-off-by: Alan Jowett <atjowet@gmail.com>
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage: 93.465%. Remained the same when pulling 3a0e957 on issue123 into 08cde73 on main.

@Alan-Jowett Alan-Jowett merged commit e40bcff into main May 9, 2023
@Alan-Jowett Alan-Jowett deleted the issue123 branch May 9, 2023 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bpf_conformance should match GCC's assembly format
2 participants