Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BeaconParser for iBeacon #13

Closed
mrtree1 opened this issue Aug 11, 2014 · 4 comments
Closed

BeaconParser for iBeacon #13

mrtree1 opened this issue Aug 11, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@mrtree1
Copy link

mrtree1 commented Aug 11, 2014

Quick and obvious question: What's the parsing string for iBeacons?

I'd like to use this library, but I need to support iBeacons as well, and I'm currently using the previous iBeacon library.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 11, 2014

The solution in this post on Stack Overflow worked for me:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25027983/is-this-the-correct-layout-to-detect-ibeacons-with-altbeacons-android-beacon-li
On 11 Aug 2014 10:47, "Tree" notifications@github.com wrote:

Quick and obvious question: What's the parsing string for iBeacons?

I'd like to use this library, but I need to support iBeacons as well, and
I'm currently using the previous iBeacon library.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#13.

@mrtree1
Copy link
Author

mrtree1 commented Aug 11, 2014

Thanks Justin, that works for me.

It would seem fairly natural to want iBeacon support built into this library, or at least have a clearer indication of what to do for them given the old iBeacon library page redirects to this project. Is there a legal reason to avoid mentioning iBeacons in the readme?

@davidgyoung
Copy link
Member

Apologies for the somewhat vague response... the library is intentionally designed to be free of intellectual property. Frustrating as it is, providing explicit instructions on how to use the library with specific proprietary beacons is impossible without bringing that property into the library documentation. The end result is that if you want to use the library with proprietary beacons, you have to find this information on third party sites.

@mrtree1
Copy link
Author

mrtree1 commented Aug 11, 2014

Thanks for clarifying the reasoning David. I understand the rationale. At least there is a link to the solution directly from the project now :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants