Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Question] Deploy without need for S3 bucket #891

Open
gymnae opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

[Question] Deploy without need for S3 bucket #891

gymnae opened this issue May 19, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@gymnae
Copy link

gymnae commented May 19, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I tried to deploy via docker-compose and saw that the spinup failed due to missing S3 data in the ENV variables. According to the documentation S3 is used for storing user profile images. Since I don't have an AWS account at the moment but enough storage on the host, I wonder if this could be avoided

Describe the solution you'd like
Deploy isolated to a host, with all data stored locally either in named volumes or host mounted folders
@gymnae gymnae added the enhancement New feature or request label May 19, 2022
@modem7
Copy link
Contributor

modem7 commented May 29, 2022

Related to #830

@dvd741-a
Copy link

dvd741-a commented Jun 6, 2022 •
edited
Loading

#906

Once this gets approved & merged, add environmental variable:
STORAGE_S3_ENABLED=false

@dvd741-a
Copy link

@gymnae - Should be resolved with above ENV variable value put to false

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@modem7 @gymnae @dvd741-a