refactor: utilize super().config

[antazoey]

What I did

simple code sharing refactor and add a missing cfg doc

How I did it

How to verify it

Checklist

• All changes are completed
• New test cases have been added
• Documentation has been updated

[fubuloubu]

Won't this not work unless overrided somewhere in the class heirarchy? (it will have attribute error if not subclassed)

[antazoey]

it seems to work:

(ape310) ➜  ape git:(chore/network-cfg-clean) ape console

In [1]: networks.ethereum.config.default_network
Out[1]: 'local'

In [2]: type(networks.ethereum.config)
Out[2]: ape_ethereum.ecosystem.EthereumConfig

In [3]: networks.polygon.config.default_network
Out[3]: 'local'

In [4]: type(networks.polygon.config)
Out[4]: ape_polygon.ecosystem.PolygonConfig

What super().config does as far as I understand is call EcoystemAPI.config which is for sure a base class to Ethereum. The implementation for EcosystemAPI.config is:

    @property
    def config(self) -> PluginConfig:
        """
        The configuration of the ecosystem. See :class:`ape.managers.config.ConfigManager`
        for more information on plugin configurations.

        Returns:
            :class:`ape.api.config.PluginConfig`
        """

        return self.config_manager.get_config(self.name)

so ultimately we are sharing code by calling up to super().

---

But I am curious why you say what you say here in case I don't understand because ngl, some of the class stuff i Python can be gray.

[fubuloubu]

As long as EcosystemAPI.config doesn't keep calling up (which it doesn't appear to do)

[antazoey]

It would also have to call super().config and so on

[fubuloubu]

As long as EcosystemAPI.config doesn't keep calling up (which it doesn't appear to do)