-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 545
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Find a way to make Python apps portable #131
Comments
Just putting python and its required modules and libs inside the AppImage should do the trick; as long as python is coming from an "old enough" host like CentOS 6. |
Is there any example somewhere of a working AppImage that does it? I tried to do it a while ago and failed (worked with perl and java, but not with python) |
Hi guys, Admittedly, I haven't really had a chance to try it out. The web page states that
So, maybe, a python app can be first processed by PyInstaller in the single directory packaging mode. And then the generated directory can be packed as an AppImage. |
This has been solved a long time ago, see https://github.com/probonopd/AppImages/blob/master/recipes/pythongtk3hello/Recipe for an example. |
The currently recommended cause of action is to also bundle python itself, and either set |
Is there an up-to-date example of this? The link no longer exists. |
@aarmea-butterfly you can try https://github.com/TheAssassin/linuxdeploy-plugin-conda, the latest and greatest way to make AppImages with Python. Not very well documented yet, so please visit us on IRC to allow us to guide you (#appimage on Freenode). |
Mu Editor looks like its a\Appimage functions this way: https://github.com/mu-editor/mu/releases/download/v1.1.1/Mu_Editor-1.1.1-x86_64.AppImage |
Python apps are not really portable: the python interpreter is needed in the host system, along with pygtk2, and weird stuff happens on many distros like Archlinux or OpenSUSE (see #6)
Possibilities:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: