Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make dense smart cables also from normal smart cables #3930

Closed
Domkeykong opened this issue Feb 10, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Make dense smart cables also from normal smart cables #3930

Domkeykong opened this issue Feb 10, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
good-first-issue Issues that may be good for new contributors open-for-discussion Open for feedback from players or other devs
Milestone

Comments

@Domkeykong
Copy link

Make dense smart cables also from normal smart cables!
Currently there is no way to convert normal smart cables to dense smart cables.
Much like you make them now have 4 smart cables become 1 dense smart cables so you can basically upgrade them.

@yueh
Copy link
Member

yueh commented Feb 15, 2019

Already considered it, but was somewhat reluctant about it as this upgrade path would increase the redstone and glowstone costs by 4 times as much.

This would probably be fine when rarely used, but in case it is used with autocrafting it can easily lead the system to pick covered cable -> smart cable -> dense smart as path instead of coverered -> dense -> smart dense and put a hefty cost into it.

Might be an idea to streamline it at some point, but for 1.12 it is simply to late.

@yueh yueh added the open-for-discussion Open for feedback from players or other devs label Feb 15, 2019
@yueh yueh added this to the backlog milestone Feb 15, 2019
@Carnaxus
Copy link

Carnaxus commented Jun 2, 2019

Most autocrafting systems (including AE2's, unless I'm mistaken) either allow or require you, the player, to specify the recipe for each stage of the crafting process. Buildcraft's Automated Workbench, ProjectRed's Project Bench, Immersive Engineering's multiblock Assembler, RFTools' three tiers of Crafter, Thermal Expansion's Sequential Fabricator (CoFH and their complex names...), and EnderIO's Crafter all require manual recipe setup. There may be other mods with other autocrafting functionality, but I'd be surprised if any of them just randomly selected a recipe path to get to a final product.

@Pingger
Copy link

Pingger commented Aug 27, 2019

My opinion:
The player has to create a pattern for Cables to Dense Cables. If the players chooses to create the pattern with smart cables instead, that's on them.
For that to work, the dense cable recipies need to be separated and not combined into a single one with oredict.

@Hevlikn
Copy link

Hevlikn commented Sep 9, 2019

My opinion:
The player has to create a pattern for Cables to Dense Cables. If the players chooses to create the pattern with smart cables instead, that's on them.

Agreed here, plus redstone and glowstone are often in abundance. This seems like a method you'd use manually when you need just one or two more pieces of dense, and don't want to trek back to your terminal. I think it's one of those QOL things; similarly you could consider why you can't craft 4 of a coloured cable into the coloured dense version, or even reverse craft a dense into 4.

For that to work, the dense cable recipies need to be separated and not combined into a single one with oredict.

I don't think this applies, as smart dense can only be created through washing smart dense coloured (which is ore-dict) or applying glow+red to a fluix dense. I'm not sure ore-dict allows replacing completely different shaped recipes!

@Technici4n Technici4n added the good-first-issue Issues that may be good for new contributors label Dec 20, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
good-first-issue Issues that may be good for new contributors open-for-discussion Open for feedback from players or other devs
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants