Package should expose 'normalise' as well

[Arachnid]

Or at least, it'd be really nice if it did that.

[danfinlay]

Oh, that's really reasonable. Now I feel silly for having exported a function instead of an object... Dare I try something hacky like hanging a function on another function, to preserve backwards-compatibility? Or maybe just a major version bump...

[Arachnid]

Personally, I think a major version bump would be fine at this point. If you do that, I can dump a couple of deps from ethereum-ens and depend on this instead. :)

…

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:23 PM Dan Finlay ***@***.***> wrote: Oh, that's really reasonable. Now I feel silly for having exported a function instead of an object... Dare I try something hacky like hanging a function on another function, to preserve backwards-compatibility? Or maybe just a major version bump... — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABFyW6KZSit8YJJ8MVVx0_L886hJK8rks5r21sugaJpZM4NSMMb> .

[danfinlay]

Ok, doing that now.

[danfinlay]

Published to npm as 2.0.0!

[Arachnid]

Thanks!

…

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:36 PM Dan Finlay ***@***.***> wrote: Published to npm as 2.0.0! — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABFyVZnC67I7J8MvSdAuYPFKPwIxGcvks5r2146gaJpZM4NSMMb> .