Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

config about DeepLO #20

Open
rginjapan opened this issue Apr 5, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

config about DeepLO #20

rginjapan opened this issue Apr 5, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@rginjapan
Copy link
Contributor

DeepLIO Network

deeplio:
dropout: 0.25
pretrained: false
model-path: ""
lidar-feat-net:
name: "lidar-feat-simple-1"
pretrained: false
model-path: ""
imu-feat-net:
name: "imu-feat-rnn" # See the name is commented out
pretrained: false
model-path: ""
odom-feat-net:
name: # "odom-feat-fc" # See the name is commented out
pretrained: false
model-path: ""
fusion-net: "fusion-layer"

why you comment odom-feat-fc, I think odom is still necessary but fusion-net should be commented.

@rginjapan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have trained lidarsegpoint net + odometry RNN net, the result is very bad no matter in training dataset and test dataset. Could you give me some instructions about how to reproduce the result of DeepLO in the paper?
Btw, in DeepVO (https://github.com/ChiWeiHsiao/DeepVO-pytorch), the network is CNN + LSTM, which I think is similar with lidarsegpoint net + odometry RNN net I have tested. But the results are very bad in my test.

@rginjapan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I know why you did not comment fusion-net in DeepLO, because the fusion-net will be created only when both lidar-net and imu-net existed. So why you comment out odom-net in DeepLO?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant