Stardew Valley: Options page documentation improvements #3155
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
waiting-on: peer-review
agilbert1412
added
the
is: documentation
|
Looks fine to me. |
nicholassaylor
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2024
Exempt-Medic
added
waiting-on: core-review
|
Some of these option descriptions have questions marks, which makes them read strangely. Some of them much more than others and there are some periods missing from the end of some sentences, but those are out of scope for this change. The actual changes here seem good to me |
Exempt-Medic
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2024
ThePhar
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2024
ThePhar
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is this fixing or adding?
1: Fixed a typo (leaning -> learning)
2: Shortened the goal documentation so that the tooltip is more readable (hopefully)
How was this tested?
Documentation