Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use linkspector #9

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 8, 2024
Merged

Use linkspector #9

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 8, 2024

Conversation

hugobuddel
Copy link
Contributor

@hugobuddel hugobuddel commented Jan 8, 2024

Use linkspector instead of markdown-link-check

markdown-link-check does not work with the new redirection scheme of SPIE, see AstarVienna/ScopeSim#322

The creator the github action we used to use, states that we should move to linkspector: https://github.com/gaurav-nelson/github-action-markdown-link-check

See #10 to see how the action looks for a broken link.

@hugobuddel hugobuddel marked this pull request as draft January 8, 2024 14:56
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2a382c8) 100.00% compared to head (e7e5f49) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master        #9   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines            7         7           
=========================================
  Hits             7         7           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hugobuddel hugobuddel marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2024 16:35
Copy link
Contributor

@teutoburg teutoburg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Certainly good to have a more up-to-date (and maintained) version of this that works for all cases. Probably this now means we have to call this DevOps in every other repo, AFAIK we're just calling the old one everywhere, and not refer to this in DevOps...

@hugobuddel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, it is now clear that even if it wouldn't save much lines of code, it would still have been useful to refer to this workflow from the beginning.

@hugobuddel hugobuddel merged commit 3ee4240 into master Jan 8, 2024
18 checks passed
@hugobuddel hugobuddel deleted the hb/uselinkspector branch January 8, 2024 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants