-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Capitalism makes Wealth an OP stat #1
Comments
Here's how I think we should proceed:
The tax applies to all areas (real estate, food, fuel, transportation, lodging, etc, paid via vendor markup to base prices) and is also assessed against assets such as investments, as well as having exceptions for medical or life needs. Corporate profits should be taxed similarly, based on an assessment of assets and budgets and with tax breaks for corporations that pay their employees well and provide healthcare and other such beneficial things. |
I like to categorize solutions in terms of what I've been calling "stages of change". I think what you're talking about above are stage 1, things that could be accomplished logistically if given control of sufficient resources. Given that, all four of your proposals fall within the range of changes I would find acceptable or beneficial. Point 1 especially seems like a fundamentally good idea, presuming that we continue to need taxation as a means of funding the commons. There are some things I could add that would be compatible with your list, and probably some things that would go beyond it. Compatible items:
(I've probably got a lot more that I just can't think of at the moment.) Taking a significantly different fork, I could go into my plans to slowly transform society by reclaiming the economy (this plan is intended to cover all three stages of change). |
@woozalia I think I'm going to try to apply a hotfix to this particular problem. I'm forming literal
|
I have lots of little questions around current status items mentioned here, but those are probably best asked elsewhere. |
|
Could someone build a "darkpi catcher"? |
|
Re "darkpi catcher": this would probably have to be something that happens in orbit, since the only way to have something survive re-entry at orbital speeds is, basically, ablative material, which is heavy (therefore expensive). I can see some kind of orbit-based dead-tinysat-catcher being cost-effective eventually but probably not anytime soon. |
I mean like a darkpi MITMer, like an IMSI catcher but for darkpis? |
@SoniEx2 exploits are a bit of a thing I've been thinking about, since the whole point of this is "what if the internet becomes, essentially, hostile?". Sure, you can MITM it, but as the actual unit is designed to securely wiped if it detects (via a delightful array of current draw, unexpected movement, rotation, and magnetic field resonance sensors) something being tampered with, and everything is e2e encrypted, I am assuming people will try to do this, and we'll need to keep thinking of ways to prevent it from harming the network, layer after layer of protections. No computer is secure. @woozalia b) If and when we get into low earth orbit, the wiki section I linked to has a 300+km LRWiFi connection transmitting and receiving, so we can at the very least learn from that and research ways to duplicate or improve on their antenna configuration. Once we can achieve low earth orbit, we can just start adding connections at higher altitudes until we have enough to cover the planet and get email from the moon. c) We're planning to give the actual microsats some gyro and wobble motors (in addition to the movement/tilt/acceleration sensors, so the microsat will be able to point an antenna (at a location or another microsat) and hold it stable for when a higher bandwidth connection is necessary or scheduled. d) The LRWiFi wikipedia page lists several other long distance networks that break the standard slightly, so aren't technically LRWiFi networks, but several of them have the possibility of being cost effective for our purposes. e) The xBee stuff is all for short range syncing and key exchange, whenever two nodes are close enough spatially to swap deltas. Think of it as a 'command and control' network and encryption public key directory, with a distributed system of trust based on an ongoing remote audit of the system binaries and running processes. Suggestion: |
What would happen if someone launched hundreds of thousands of malicious darkpi nodes? |
@SoniEx2 they can participate in the network, but they can't really do anything, since between e2e encryption, multipath tcp and the file storage algorithm always moving blocks of data, there's no data except a file hash, and no relevant metadata. |
ok. do discovery keys match encryption keys? or are discovery keys derived from encryption keys? are files encrypted (and signed)? you say "file hash" but how does that work? (those questions are really two parts of the same question, but you seem to imply e2ee and file storage are separate parts of the system...) for full-duplex communication, do you have a fixed number of hops? do you take the shortest path? or do you take a random path? given that this will run over a space mesh, it's quite reasonable to think of it taking random paths rather than fixed number of hops or shortest path. I can't think of any easy way to execute an attack on such a system, besides launching thousands of malicious nodes. (since you can't otherwise be sure you're on the right path.) this probably means there's something I'm missing, but I really want this to work. |
Lets try and avoid a "Atlas Shrugged" type situation though. I think all current ideas of a "economy" need to be thrown out and we need to get some people working on a more sustainable system, as they have been reporting for years that all economies in their current state/configuration are completely unsustainable. (And will likely result in a global depression killing hundreds of millions in less than 75 years) |
@SoniEx2 not sure what you mean by "discovery key". The current paradigm uses public/private keypairs for encryption, which means public keys are broadcast by each node, and each user has a public key, so any node can talk to any user securely, and the same goes for inter-node comms. Files are encrypted and signed by the user. The blocks of data are sync'd with wherever is nearest, and then distributed to long term storage structures as time and bandwidth permits. A file hash is, currently, just part of the index for "where are the encrypted block(s)", and uses the The user, who originally created the file with their private key, attempts to access their (non-local) file, and their user account tells the backend system "I need blocks As far as routing algorithms, it depends on the user setting. The default is to plot a best-fit path between the user and the system, and from the system to the data. But because the system is designed around caching, it means that some portions of a file may be close, and others may be far. The goal is a p2p system very similar to the way torrents currently work (using a resource hash instead of a URI/Magnet link/.torrent/etc, and doing verification of data based on other copies before it's presented to the user as "their data"), but designed around encryption of all data, both in transit and in place. It literally doesn't matter how many malicious nodes you launch. The local system will continue trying to get a validate-able file (which was signed by the user when they created it) until either the timeout is hit (set by the node admin), the user hits "cancel" on loading the file, or the node goes completely offline. @Reddawg99 I'm in agreement that the current system is broken. However, change has to come incrementally, or people get overwhelmed and panic. That's why I'm suggesting that the hotfix for this involves using modern engineering to bootstrap a small group of individuals into an independent effort that operates under communistic principles, intentional kindness, and a willingness to prioritize long term survival over quarterly profit. |
Tracking is the main threat model in this capitalistic world. |
With a small group of individuals controlling the majority of the wealth in our solar systems, the Wealth stat becomes a heavy tool wielded without consideration for harm by individuals and organizations who are willing to sacrifice the well-being and health and lives of others in exchange for more zeros in their digital coinpurse.
I've heard that communism and/or socialism might be good options for fixing this unbalanced problem. That's a long term fix tho.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: