You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is the same as earlier reported in monthly meeting.
When we creates structural floors and associated beams in Revit we usally use the nearet level as reference level with a smal offset or without a offset.
Revit will automatically use the elementhost/reference level when assigning BUILDINGSTOREY to the IfcElement. This is often not correct according to the elements floor affiliation that's defined by our projects BIM manuals.
A workaround is to assign the elementhost (floor and beamsystems) to a "correct" reference level below and with a large offset. We will then lose the opportunity to easy change the element z-location when the relative height for a storey changes. That's common in early stages of a project.
I would like to have the opportunity to manually override a element relations to IfcBuildingStorey.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue is the same as earlier reported in monthly meeting.
When we creates structural floors and associated beams in Revit we usally use the nearet level as reference level with a smal offset or without a offset.
Revit will automatically use the elementhost/reference level when assigning BUILDINGSTOREY to the IfcElement. This is often not correct according to the elements floor affiliation that's defined by our projects BIM manuals.
A workaround is to assign the elementhost (floor and beamsystems) to a "correct" reference level below and with a large offset. We will then lose the opportunity to easy change the element z-location when the relative height for a storey changes. That's common in early stages of a project.
I would like to have the opportunity to manually override a element relations to IfcBuildingStorey.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: