Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to prevent export of IfcAdvancedBrep #480

Open
jmirtsch opened this issue Jul 8, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Option to prevent export of IfcAdvancedBrep #480

jmirtsch opened this issue Jul 8, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or improvement request geometry Error in geometry results Revit Triage Initial inspection of issue to determine labels and urgency UI/UX A user interface or behavioral issue

Comments

@jmirtsch
Copy link
Contributor

jmirtsch commented Jul 8, 2022

I'd like to seek opinions on an export option for IFC4 Design Transfer View to prevent IfcAdvancedBreps.
Not many implementations support this concept well.
From my testing, Revit will often not try and detect extrusions prior, so IFC files can be larger than they need to be.

IFC4 Reference view does not include many semantic concepts (eg material layers) that are needed for exchange workflows,
hence many projects persisting with IFC2x3 Coordination model view.
If an export option to prevent advanced breps was enabled, it would help facilitate more advanced workflows using IFC4.

@AngelVelezSosa
Copy link
Contributor

If advanced BReps are a problem (and I can understand how they are/would be), it seems like better solutions would be:

  1. Implement a "fallback" similar to that being used in IFC4.3, and most importantly
  2. Create an MVD that would support this, given that DTV doesn't actually exist.

@Moult
Copy link

Moult commented Jul 25, 2022

The two big players that don't support IfcAdvancedBreps are Solibri and Trimble.

I think the bigger issue than IfcAdvancedBReps being unsupported by those two is that Revit seems to unnecessarily use IfcAdvancedBReps for things that could easily be an extrusion or polygonal face set instead. Advanced BReps should only be used for... well, advanced things.

@JOuellette-Autodesk JOuellette-Autodesk added enhancement New feature or improvement request UI/UX A user interface or behavioral issue geometry Error in geometry results Triage Initial inspection of issue to determine labels and urgency Revit labels Feb 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or improvement request geometry Error in geometry results Revit Triage Initial inspection of issue to determine labels and urgency UI/UX A user interface or behavioral issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants