Editing Toolkit: Update the readme to include a "rename info" section #45212
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Copons
added
the
[Status] Needs Review
|
This PR does not affect the size of JS and CSS bundles shipped to the user's browser. Generated by performance advisor bot at iscalypsofastyet.com. |
|
Caution: This PR affects files in the Editing Toolkit Plugin on WordPress.com D48620-code has been created so you can easily test it on your sandbox. See this FieldGuide page about developing the Editing Toolkit Plugin for more info: PCYsg-ly5-p2 |
noahtallen
approved these changes
Aug 26, 2020
matticbot
removed
the
[Status] Needs Review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #45186 (comment)
With #44501 we renamed most of the FSE plugin to Editing Toolkit.
When merging, I've missed this readme mentioning the ongoing renaming process.
I'm aware that some of the "did not change" items are being worked on (e.g. #44552), but I think we can still say that the rename has been completed, as the phrasing in the readme is clear enough imho regarding what has and has not been done.