Numpy caching of data in online monitor storage #698
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What is the problem / what does the code in this PR do
In #346, we uttered the prophetic words
It's just the backend-buffer that is sitting otherwise idle in the background eating your RAM that needs clearing.
We now learned that this is true when we have longer than usual runs and data with large volumes.
We also should have known that the
sys.getsizeof
wasn't taking the total size of the document but only of the dictionary.This PR fixes both with using numpy for the buffers such that the max size of buffers is respected by the backend.