New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
'LinuxDynamicWorkersNotAllowedInResourceGroup' error occurs when trying to have an app service and a linux function app in same resource group #1952
Comments
Yes, There is work in progress to remove this limitation. But no ETA yet. |
Closing this issue as the required information is provided, please find any further updates in the App Service Announcements issues page: https://github.com/Azure/app-service-announcements/issues |
How does this look like please at the moment? This is really awkward limitation :-/ |
We also just hit this yesterday. Not a big deal, since it's easy to workaround, but makes deployment a bit more complicated and ugly. Is there any current status for this? |
I am also facing same issue, what is the solution? |
In my case, I just choose to use Windows Function Apps since it didn't really matter to me but I did want to keep the AppService Plan on Linux. |
I encountered this issue today while deploying with bicep. I'm creating 2 service plans with 'Microsoft.Web/serverfarms@2022-09-01', one for an App Service, and another for 2 Functions App.
|
We are encountering this as well, but strangely it works in one resource group but not the other. They are both set up the same way using a bicep file. |
Odd to close this issue years before it's actually available |
@bhagyshricompany any chance to look back into this? |
This seems like a relatively common need for an unsupported scenario;
You want a web app (on linux), and you want a function app (on linux).
However, if you have a linux app service for webapps, you cannot create a dynamic linux app service in the same resource group:
https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Functions/wiki/Creating-Function-Apps-in-an-existing-Resource-Group
Are there plans to eventually fix this limitaiton?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: