Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 24, 2023. It is now read-only.

ci: Fix flaky docker rotate e2e test #4353

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 5, 2021

Conversation

jsturtevant
Copy link
Contributor

Reason for Change:

The test was checking the date which wasn't in the last 20 lines because the log output is too verbose. This checks further back in the output to ensure we always have a date stamp

Issue Fixed:

Credit Where Due:

Does this change contain code from or inspired by another project?

  • No
  • Yes

If "Yes," did you notify that project's maintainers and provide attribution?

  • No
  • Yes

Requirements:

Notes:

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 5, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #4353 (7241ba1) into master (47c439d) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4353   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.07%   72.07%           
=======================================
  Files         141      141           
  Lines       21640    21640           
=======================================
  Hits        15596    15596           
  Misses       5093     5093           
  Partials      951      951           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 47c439d...7241ba1. Read the comment docs.

@@ -2435,6 +2435,10 @@ var _ = Describe("Azure Container Cluster using the Kubernetes Orchestrator", fu
Skip("No windows agent was provisioned for this Cluster Definition")
}

if !eng.ExpandedDefinition.Properties.OrchestratorProfile.KubernetesConfig.RequiresDocker() {
Skip("Skip docker validations on non-docker-backed clusters")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CRI log rotate went stable in v1.21
kubernetes/enhancements#2411

Should we create an issue to investigate added a test for that with aks-engine?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I created #4354

Copy link
Contributor

@marosset marosset left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Copy link
Member

@mboersma mboersma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm++

Copy link
Member

@jackfrancis jackfrancis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@acs-bot
Copy link

acs-bot commented Apr 5, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jackfrancis, jsturtevant, marosset, mboersma

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [jackfrancis,jsturtevant,marosset,mboersma]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jackfrancis jackfrancis merged commit 7ae3df7 into Azure:master Apr 5, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants