Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Have UI/Design View for Durable Functions Workflow #532

Closed
brandonh-msft opened this issue Nov 28, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Have UI/Design View for Durable Functions Workflow #532

brandonh-msft opened this issue Nov 28, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
Enhancement Feature requests.

Comments

@brandonh-msft
Copy link
Member

Customer Request

Create a simple UI/Design View for users to use for Durable Functions when going throug the workflow (like that of Logic App Design View).

It enhances the user experience and helps developers debug their Durable Functions more easily.

Problem Statement: The partner would like for Durable Functions to have a simple UI or Design View, similar to the Logic App Design View.

Desired Experience: Durable Functions should have a Design View similar to the one available for Logic Apps.

@cgillum cgillum added the Enhancement Feature requests. label Nov 28, 2018
@cgillum
Copy link
Collaborator

cgillum commented Nov 28, 2018

The key value-prop of Durable Functions is that you can write workflows in code (i.e. the IDE is your designer). This is why we've stayed away from looking into a UI/design surface so far.

This doesn't mean we're completely against this idea. However, my question for you; what is it that the customer needs which cannot be solved using (as you mentioned) Azure Logic Apps? I'd like to understand that better to know if it makes sense for us to go this route vs. improving the Logic Apps experience.

@Azure Azure locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 1, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
Enhancement Feature requests.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants