Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue#156: BlobClient.listContainers does not work. #176

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

pabloaliscioni
Copy link

Issue#156: #156

I've updated the com.microsoft.windowsazure.services.blob.client.BlobDeserializationHelper class as proposed by statemachines in the description of the issue.

…ervices/blob/client/BlobDeserializationHelper.java
joostdenijs pushed a commit to joostdenijs/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2013
@ghost ghost assigned jeffreyjirwin Feb 22, 2013
@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@ogail
Copy link
Contributor

ogail commented May 9, 2014

add to whitelist

@gcheng
Copy link

gcheng commented May 9, 2014

currently storage team has their own repo, please issue this pull request against their own repo if there is any.

@gcheng gcheng closed this May 9, 2014
jianghaolu pushed a commit to jianghaolu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2017
sima-zhu pushed a commit to sima-zhu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
* Enabling user to poll long running operations

* Fixing Checkstyle violations

* Retrieving the result using location header when LRO POST completes, adding factory methods to PollingState to create it from various sources

* Addressing checkstyle errors
navalev pushed a commit to navalev/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2019
* fix clients compile warnings

* record tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants