-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Custom-vision training iteration JavaScript export #10331
Comments
Thanks for reporting @YoussefSbeiti @areddish, @tburns10, Can you clarify if this is expected behavior? cc @sarangan12 in case the service team needs any follow up from the client side |
@ramya-rao-a Yes, this is expected behavior. @YoussefSbeiti exporting an iteration is an asynchronous process, you are getting this error because You can get the status of the exports for that specific iteration by calling |
Thank you for the reply @areddish @ramya-rao-a . |
Even with python SDK, if you try to export an iteration which has already been exported ("Done" in the list) we get the same error:
A different error should be emitted to be able to distinguish that the model is already available in the exported list. |
Thanks - yes, this is an error in the error message that get's generated. I've logged an issue in our internal task system to provide a better error message and will address in a future roll out. |
Api Management - make /tenant endpoints ARM compliant in 2020-06-01-preview version (Azure#11549) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ApiManagement from version stable/2019-12-01 to version 2020-06-01-preview * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * Add support in API Management for Availability Zones (Azure#10284) * apim in azs * fix prettier check * PATCH should return 200 OK (Azure#10328) * add support for PATCH returning 200 OK * CI fixes prettier fix CI fixes part 2 * Password no longer a mandatory property when uploading Certificates * add missing x-ms-odata extension for filter support * +gatewayhostnameconfiguration protocol changes (Azure#10292) * [2020-06-01-preview] Update Oauth Server secrets Contract (Azure#10602) * Oauth server secrets contract * fix azureMonitor enum * API Management Service Deleted Services Resource (Azure#10607) * API Management Service Deleted Services Resource * Path fix * Lint + custom-words fixes * Location URI parameter for deletedservices Resource * GET for deletedservices by service name * Remove resourceGroupName from resource path * fixes * schema for purge operation * perttier applied * 204 response code added Co-authored-by: REDMOND\glfeokti <glfeokti@microsoft.com> * OperationNameFormat property added to Diagnostic contract (Azure#10641) * OperationNameFormat property added to Diagnostic contract * add azuremonitor to update contract Co-authored-by: REDMOND\glfeokti <glfeokti@microsoft.com> * [Microsoft.ApiManagement][2020-06-01-preview] Change Network Status response contract (Azure#10331) * Change Network Status response contract * Update examples for network status contract * ApiManagement - tenant/settings endpoints * ApiManagement - tenant/settings endpoints fix * ApiManagement - tenant/settings endpoints fix prettier * ApiManagement - tenant/settings endpoints fix 3 * ApiManagement - tenant/settings endpoints fix 4 * ApiManagement - tenant/settings endpoints fix 5 Co-authored-by: Samir Solanki <samirsolanki@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: maksimkim <maksim.kim@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: promoisha <feoktistovgg@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: REDMOND\glfeokti <glfeokti@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: RupengLiu <rliu1211@terpmail.umd.edu> Co-authored-by: vfedonkin <vifedo@microsoft.com>
Please provide a fix for this defect. I do believe it is only a problem with the error message wording. I believe that there is also a functional ( code ) defect that is causing the system to invoke an error message. |
@areddish Do we have an update on this issue? |
Hi @YoussefSbeiti, we deeply appreciate your input into this project. Regrettably, this issue has remained inactive for over 2 years, leading us to the decision to close it. We've implemented this policy to maintain the relevance of our issue queue and facilitate easier navigation for new contributors. If you still believe this topic requires attention, please feel free to create a new issue, referencing this one. Thank you for your understanding and ongoing support. |
Describe the bug
When trying to send a second exportIteration() request through the SDK I get the following error:
restError.ts:19 Uncaught Error: {iterationId} is already queued for export
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: