Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[FEATURE REQ] Add a TableServiceClient.GetTablesAsync(prefix: ...) overload #24414

Closed
christothes opened this issue Oct 4, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

[FEATURE REQ] Add a TableServiceClient.GetTablesAsync(prefix: ...) overload #24414

christothes opened this issue Oct 4, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
@christothes
Labels
Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. feature-request This issue requires a new behavior in the product in order be resolved. Tables
Milestone
Backlog

Comments

@christothes
Copy link
Member

Add a TableServiceClient.GetTablesAsync(prefix: ...) overload

  • This is helpful for test clean-up. I have many integration tests that run in parallel, with their own table name prefix.
  • Workaround: use an OData range query, bounded on the top by some max char (example)

(extracted from #19881)
@christothes christothes self-assigned this Oct 4, 2021
@christothes christothes added the feature-request This issue requires a new behavior in the product in order be resolved. label Oct 4, 2021
@jsquire jsquire added the Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. label Oct 11, 2022
@jsquire jsquire added this to the Backlog milestone Oct 11, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 27, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@christothes christothes

Labels
Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. feature-request This issue requires a new behavior in the product in order be resolved. Tables
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jsquire @christothes