Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update databricks module and add additional options #143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2021

Conversation

lordlinus
Copy link
Contributor

Issue-id

NA.

PR Checklist


  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I ran lint checks locally prior to submission.
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?

Description

Update Databricks terraform with newer version to support diverse cluster configurations options

Does this introduce a breaking change

  • YES
  • NO

Updated starter template to reflect the changes required

Testing

Copy link
Member

@arnaudlh arnaudlh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@arnaudlh arnaudlh self-assigned this Feb 27, 2021
Copy link
Member

@arnaudlh arnaudlh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - will check manually and merge this week - thanks for your contribution @lordlinus

@arnaudlh arnaudlh marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2021 01:42
@arnaudlh arnaudlh merged commit 2012109 into Azure:master Mar 4, 2021
@arnaudlh arnaudlh added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants