Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add Asev3 support and fix backwards comp issue in remote tfstate with try() #378

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 2, 2022
Merged

add Asev3 support and fix backwards comp issue in remote tfstate with try() #378

merged 9 commits into from
Jun 2, 2022

Conversation

iriahk89
Copy link
Contributor

@iriahk89 iriahk89 commented Jun 2, 2022 •
edited

Issue-id

PR Checklist

  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I ran lint checks locally prior to submission.
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?

Description

Does this introduce a breaking change

  • YES
  • NO

Testing

@iriahk89 iriahk89 self-assigned this Jun 2, 2022
LaurentLesle
LaurentLesle approved these changes Jun 2, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@LaurentLesle LaurentLesle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM Thanks

@LaurentLesle LaurentLesle added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 2, 2022
@LaurentLesle LaurentLesle merged commit 29ed19d into int-5.6.0 Jun 2, 2022
@LaurentLesle LaurentLesle deleted the AK-asev3 branch June 2, 2022 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@LaurentLesle LaurentLesle LaurentLesle approved these changes

Assignees

@iriahk89 iriahk89

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@iriahk89 @LaurentLesle