Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DurableTask.AzureStorage v1.3.0 release payload #212

Merged
merged 14 commits into from Aug 28, 2018
Merged

Conversation

cgillum
Copy link
Collaborator

@cgillum cgillum commented Aug 28, 2018

This is the v1.3.0 release payload for DurableTask.AzureStorage. It contains several needed perf and reliability improvements which we want to include in the Durable Functions v1.6.0 release.

Sanity checks I've done for this PR.

  • Only changes to DurableTask.AzureStorage and DurableTask.AzureStorage.Tests
  • Release build has no warnings or errors
  • All DTFx tests are passing locally.
  • All Durable Functions tests are passing when using a private version of this build.

Please approve for merging into master. :)

TsuyoshiUshio and others added 13 commits June 4, 2018 17:05
)

Allows users to query for orchestration instances which match a given search criteria.
Filters include time created, time completed, and runtime status.
)

- Refactoring of messaging code for improved maintainability
- Instance history prefetch
- New setting for max concurrent storage operation concurrency
- Switched order of history updates and outbound queue message publishing on orchestration completion
- Refactored eTag handling for improved maintainability
* Remove public Rewind API changes from DurableTask.Core
* Includes fixing broken instance query unit tests (time zone bug)
* Fixes build break from previous merge
Copy link
Contributor

@kashimiz kashimiz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit: 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants