Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing the endnote fiasco #9

Open
zwettemaan opened this issue Mar 10, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Fixing the endnote fiasco #9

zwettemaan opened this issue Mar 10, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@zwettemaan
Copy link
Collaborator

(Script in InDesign)

@zwettemaan zwettemaan added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 10, 2019
@zwettemaan zwettemaan self-assigned this Mar 10, 2019
@flittle8
Copy link
Collaborator

flittle8 commented Mar 20, 2019

Goals:

  1. Add in backlinking from endnotes/footnotes to content if backlinks don't exist
  2. Update the existing endnote code to reflect HTML 5 best practice: http://kb.daisy.org/publishing/docs/html/notes.html

@LauraB7
Copy link

LauraB7 commented Apr 6, 2019

This book, All Our Relations, is a good example of endnotes that need to be linked up, and URLs that need to be make live before exporting to EPUB.
AllOurRelations_ISTC_int Folder.zip

@flittle8
Copy link
Collaborator

flittle8 commented Apr 29, 2019

There are 2 files in the attached zip: 1 contains the Endnotes section of a book, the other contains text from the book. In the Endnotes file, you can see there is a backlink (the "return to text" line of each note). The code for both notes and note references needs to be upgraded to proper HTML 5. There are also links in the Endnotes #8

9780774838719-012-notes.zip

@flittle8
Copy link
Collaborator

@zwettemaan I've added some sample HTML files to dropbox that show how endnotes (and footnotes) can be coded.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants