Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

realization relation should not be time indexed in specification #200

Open
alanruttenberg opened this issue Jul 6, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@alanruttenberg
Copy link
Contributor

The OWL version has the current understanding, which is that realization is a relation between a realizable entity and a process. The spec has the realized_in relation as time indexed. First, this is not necessary as we can always select a time from a process via other means. Second it add confusion. Its not like a realizing process might realize a role only for some part of the processes existence. If one finds oneself wanting to say that it should be rephrased so that the entirety of the realization is the part.

@alanruttenberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also, the domain of the relation, in the elucidation, should be any realizable, not just disposition and role. There are likely to be new subclasses of realizable which will also have realizations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
@alanruttenberg and others