Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[l10n] Review and get rid of duplicate translations #5180

Open
BrianNixon opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

[l10n] Review and get rid of duplicate translations #5180

BrianNixon opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@BrianNixon
Copy link
Contributor

BOINC ships with both it and it_IT in locales. it does not appear to have been updated for a while; should it be removed?
Related: #1307

@AenBleidd
Copy link
Member

I'll check and handle this if needed. Thank you for the question, @BrianNixon

@BrianNixon
Copy link
Contributor Author

If it does get removed (because it’s out of date), we should rename it_IT to it so that translation fallback continues to work for variants like Italian (Switzerland).

@AenBleidd
Copy link
Member

Yeah, in case I decide to remove one of the translations, the one that left will be the generic one.
I'll probably go through all of them and get rid of duplicates as much as possible if any of them have no meaningful differences.

@BrianNixon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Similarly we should probably rename pt_PT to pt.

@AenBleidd AenBleidd changed the title [Client-side] Are there supposed to be two Italian translations? [l10n] Review and get rid of duplicate translations Apr 4, 2023
@AenBleidd AenBleidd removed this from Backlog in BOINC Client/Manager Aug 14, 2023
@AenBleidd AenBleidd added this to Backlog in BOINC Client/Manager via automation Aug 14, 2023
@AenBleidd AenBleidd moved this from Backlog to Prioritized in BOINC Client/Manager Aug 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Prioritized
BOINC Client/Manager
  
Prioritized
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants