New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] Data is getting duplicated when modifying the content after importing data in a repeatable component #91
Comments
We have the same behaviour here. |
I have had this problem aswell, |
Same here. Going to try @meganoob1337 solution.... |
I am facing the same issue, can this be fixed please? |
https://discord.com/channels/1021121498276171786/1021121949537153145/1049829680573849661 A user on the discord channel has figured out a work around until this is fixed Here are the steps:
This took me about ~10 minutes to do on a pretty big strapi project. |
Awesome! In case somebody is looking for a SQL query that might be helpful for the case described by @Kyle772, it's here, #81 (comment) |
Thank you for this detailed report folks! Checkout version 1.19.0 that fixes the issue |
Data is getting duplicated when modifying the content after importing data in a repeatable component
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Importing the exported content file in a 2nd workspace with same Test content type and it is getting successfully saved
After refreshing the page and trying to modifying or adding new data to the imported content
After clicking save the data is getting duplicated like below and also not able to delete duplicated content
Expected behavior
After modifying the imported content, The content should not be duplicated in repeatable component
Additional context
I tried to use strapi unique field option but there is a bug in strapi that is not letting me add new data even though content is unique
Im new to this. Let me know if there is anything im missing.
Really appreciate your work, this plugin is very useful. Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: