New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BIP-520-Funding-Ecosystem-Onsite-Q2-2024 #703
Conversation
Sends 46475.05 USDC to Opco Multisig from Dao Multisig. Simulation: https://dashboard.tenderly.co/public/safe/safe-apps/simulator/c8804dae-661b-444f-a666-f096758451d0
BIP validation results for file BIPs/2023-W51/BIP-520.json:
|
FILENAME:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gosuto-inzasheru we could rename the foundation multisig to opco. |
@Tritium-VLK why did you close without merging? |
@gosuto-inzasheru good question. Reopining it and moving for exec next week. |
BIP validation results for file BIPs/2023-W51/BIP-520.json:
|
FILENAME:
|
BIP validation results for file BIPs/2024-W4/BIP-520.json:
|
FILENAME:
|
Note that the check failed because the prettier action couldn't find the new MaxiOps directory in this commit on the repo before we added it. It printed the report first so you can see it still worked. |
BIP validation results for file BIPs/2024-W4/BIP-520.json:
|
FILENAME:
|
… reports) + reformat JSON
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rebasing took care of the issue of running prettier
on /MaxiOps
Sends 46475.05 USDC to Opco Multisig from Dao Multisig.
Simulation: https://dashboard.tenderly.co/public/safe/safe-apps/simulator/c8804dae-661b-444f-a666-f096758451d0