Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Method for determining interface packet count #280

Closed
tgolden313 opened this issue Apr 12, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Method for determining interface packet count #280

tgolden313 opened this issue Apr 12, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@tgolden313
Copy link
Contributor

When sending a large chunk of data to COSMOS, sometimes the interface backs up with packets and it can take a bit of time to process all the packets. For a script that connects the interface, sends data, and then disconnects the interface (for instance is process stored data files) - there's no clean way to know that the interface is done.

At first I attempted to use System.targets[XX].tlm_cnt - but this value is always 0. For the case of multiple interfaces for a target - seems like access to tlm_cnt via the interface would be helpful.

@ghost ghost added the feature label Apr 13, 2016
@donaldatball donaldatball self-assigned this May 10, 2017
donaldatball pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2017
donaldatball pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2017
…hods to retrieve all information displayed by CTS
donaldatball pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 16, 2017
re #280 Add methods to COSMOS API to get interface cmd/tlm packet counts
@donaldatball
Copy link
Contributor

Closed with 1d0aed1. New methods are documented on the website.

@ghost ghost modified the milestone: v3.9.2 May 18, 2017
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 20, 2022
Merge in COSMOSEE/base from send_raw to master

* commit '7d1bab9b455aa7b4edb55939053d300e5f12e22d':
  Add time to UNKNOWN packet
  Write UNKNOWN packet on write_raw
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants