Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Commit Or Rollback Revert #166

Merged

Conversation

rianquinn
Copy link
Member

We started using gsl::finally with a set of modifications that
were pitched to the Core Guidelines for consideration, and
this patch provides the code that seems to be more inline
with what they are looking for. This patch also addresses an
issue with thread local storage (we were not handling this
properly), and it addresses an issue with Astyle (it was
not actually being checked by Travis CI

Signed-off-by: “Rian <“rianquinn@gmail.com”>

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 5306486 on rianquinn:revert_commit_rollback_changes into aacc91e on Bareflank:master.

We started using gsl::finally with a set of modifications that
were pitched to the Core Guidelines for consideration, and
this patch provides the code that seems to be more inline
with what they are looking for. This patch also addresses an
issue with thread local storage (we were not handling this
properly), and it addresses an issue with Astyle (it was
not actually being checked by Travis CI

Signed-off-by: “Rian <“rianquinn@gmail.com”>
@rianquinn rianquinn force-pushed the revert_commit_rollback_changes branch from 5306486 to 9da337d Compare September 1, 2016 17:02
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 9da337d on rianquinn:revert_commit_rollback_changes into aacc91e on Bareflank:master.

@brendank310 brendank310 merged commit 7330891 into Bareflank:master Sep 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants