Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create test.js #14

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Create test.js #14

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

BasantPandey
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

}

var distance = getDistance(0, 0, 100, 100);
alert(distance);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code looks good and does what it intends to do, calculate the Euclidean distance between two points. Here are a few suggestions for improvements:

  1. Use 'let' instead of 'var': Since you're using ES6 syntax, it's better to use let instead of var to update variable values.

  2. Type declarations: The type declarations in the function signature, "Number", are not needed as JavaScript is a dynamically typed language.

  3. Parameter naming for readability: Consider naming your variables with more meaningful names than xA, yA, etc., to make the code easier to understand.

  4. Floating point precision limitations: If you are working with very small distances that need high levels of precision, using a different method to calculate the distance (such as haversine formula) may be necessary.

Overall, the code looks functional and should work without problems.

}

var distance = getDistance(0, 0, 100, 100);
alert(distance);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code appears to be JavaScript function that calculates the Euclidean distance between two points specified by their x and y coordinates. The code looks straightforward and concise, and I cannot identify any obvious bug risks from it.

However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:

  • It is generally recommended to use let or const to declare variables instead of var.
  • The function parameters could be named more descriptively to enhance readability.
  • The function can be made more reusable by passing in the two sets of coordinates as an Array or Object rather than individual arguments (xA,yA,xB,yB).
  • If the function is intended to handle large numbers or very small differences, it may be worth using an alternative formula to avoid floating-point issues.

Overall, the code seems functional and well-written, but making some minor improvements could make it even better.

@BasantPandey BasantPandey deleted the BasantPandey-patch-10 branch June 13, 2023 12:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant