Local adjustements - Color appearance Cam16 and Log encoding - Harmonize Abstract Profile

[Desmis]

I had some problems with the lacam16 branch merging with dev, which led me to change the pull request

I put the previous PR in draft mode.

The content is the same

[Desmis]

@Lawrence37

I come to you because I think, unless there is an error on my part, or my configuration (which is nothing special), that there is a malfunction in the last "merge" #6769 - under Windows (I am with Windows 11). But maybe it's something else ?
I tried it - without realizing it - but only with one screen because I was on the move (I have a laptop). Everything seemed to be working normally.

Yesterday morning I did a merge with "dev" and my 2 screen configuration. As soon as I started it I saw something wrong.
This is why I created another PR "lacam16n2" without this merge.

The problem also appears in my latest "Dev" version and is therefore not linked (I think) to lacam16
What is happening ? You know I'm not at all an expert on this sort of thing:

• in Preferences: Editor Layout , only 2 selections possibles - Single Editor tabs Mode, Vertical Tabs - Multiple editor Tabs mode. The other choice are selected the first time, then ignored.
• Position of curve copy & paste buttons : ignored

it seems that the 'option' file is corrupted and the only solution, when I take a version that works correctly is to delete the 'options' file
When you activate "2 screen" mode : Multiple editor Tabs ..own Window mode"... The image is curious, superimposing in the preview, that of the file browser, vertically on the left.
I attach a screenshot
The file browser with Multiple editor Tabs ..own Window mode"..

The preview (2 snd screen)

I know you don't have Windows natively. If you tell me what to look at, retouch, no problem.
but I don't think I'm the only one??

Thank you very much

Jacques

[Desmis]

@Lawrence37 @sgotti

I think you fixed the bug...
All seems to work fine

Thank you very much

Jacques

[Desmis]

@Lawrence37
The numerous tests carried out on the challenge and before the challenge, revealed several bugs (7 I think). The system seems stable now.
https://discuss.pixls.us/t/rawtherapee-processing-challenge/42647/78

Asking you for a review seems difficult, as the code has undergone some major changes over the past 1 year.
I think this challenge is a good way of validating the code itself.

Of course I don't forbid you to "look" and make a review. I propose a merge early next week (within 7 to 8 days).

Thank you very much

Jacques

[Lawrence37]

It is reassuring that several people have tried it. I would like to try it myself, but I have been busier than usual and there are also a few other open PRs to look at.

[Desmis]

@Lawrence37

With all branches open... I made a mistake, the branch to evaluate and merge is lacam16n2

Sorry

Jacques