-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multiple users reporting for same moth trap #114
Comments
@larspett could these traps be public or do you want to restrict who can see a shared trap? @johnvanbreda the app uses |
@kazlauskis the request generates the following SQL in the WHERE part of the query: WHERE t1.deleted=false
AND ((t2.website_id=2 AND t1.created_by_id=3) OR t1.public=true)
AND t1.location_type_id=18879 So the logic is currently to fetch all location of that type if they are public or if they are created by the logged in user and linked to the website. |
In that case, is it a matter of setting |
I will check with present Swedish moth recorders during the weeken to hear their preferences for the site selection and the multiple trapping days options.
13 okt. 2023 kl. 16:04 skrev Karolis Kazlauskis ***@***.***>:
In that case, is it a matter of setting public=true when creating a moth trap location? I assume the public is a system attribute that can be set.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#114 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEVQXZGHPDTD34RQMEAK3LLX7FC7HANCNFSM6AAAAAA53RSGFI>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Similar to how butterfly transects are unique, there is a need to implement standardised, unique trap sites for moth traps within ButterflyCount. This would allow moth trap sites to be handled by more than one person. We are a team taking care of the two Ecology Building moth traps and would want to allow multiple persons to upload data from these two traps. Not having this option will flood the system with multiple sites that are really the same ones once the system starts to be used for systematic moth monitoring (which will happen next year, most likely).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: