Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is it intended that this repo have no license and therefore not be open source? #7

Open
rgostic opened this issue Apr 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Is it intended that this repo have no license and therefore not be open source? #7

rgostic opened this issue Apr 8, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@rgostic
Copy link

rgostic commented Apr 8, 2019

No description provided.

@rgostic
Copy link
Author

rgostic commented Apr 8, 2019

I was thinking about using this library as it serves my needs perfectly! Just was wondering if this was intended or not. I did some googling and it says to always assume no license means not open source and therefore you should not use.

@afk11
Copy link
Member

afk11 commented Apr 9, 2019

Err, nope, the licence ought to be there! https://github.com/Bit-Wasp/bech32/blob/master/composer.json#L6 thanks for opening the issue, will push this now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@afk11 @rgostic