Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: fix ci after repo move to bitboxswiss #2716

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

thisconnect
Copy link
Collaborator

The repo changed to github.com/BitBoxSwiss

@thisconnect thisconnect marked this pull request as draft May 15, 2024 17:11
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@thisconnect thisconnect force-pushed the ci-with-bitboxswiss branch 4 times, most recently from 59adb11 to 8f0c1c9 Compare May 16, 2024 07:27
@thisconnect
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I believe this is unrelated, and a random fail that sometimes occurs.. I'll run pipeline one more time.

 === RUN   TestAccountsByKeystore
    accounts_test.go:1435: 
        	Error Trace:	/opt/go/src/github.com/BitBoxSwiss/bitbox-wallet-app/backend/accounts_test.go:1435
        	Error:      	"[0xc0005b3080 0xc0005b4100 0xc0005b3600 0xc0005b4680 0xc0005b3b80]" should have 3 item(s), but has 5
        	Test:       	TestAccountsByKeystore
--- FAIL: TestAccountsByKeystore (0.13s)

@thisconnect thisconnect marked this pull request as ready for review May 16, 2024 09:35
@thisconnect
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@benma ci passed, please let me know if I should just squash all commits or if there is anything else that needs to be changed.

Copy link
Contributor

@benma benma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All looks good, but you missed appveyor.yml, which has some digitalbitbox folders left. Thanks!

And yes please squash in the end, it's one logical change to move the org.

@thisconnect
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think appveyor ci isn't running at all, @benma could you login and see if we need to activate appveyor for bitboxswiss ?

@benma
Copy link
Contributor

benma commented May 16, 2024

I think appveyor ci isn't running at all, @benma could you login and see if we need to activate appveyor for bitboxswiss ?

I changed the repo url in appveyor, can you push again to see if it will be triggered? Amending commit with no change or a small commit msg change.

Copy link
Contributor

@benma benma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice, thanks!!

The GitHub org changed to github.com/BitBoxSwiss

- update ghcr url to use bitboxswiss, using lowercase bitboxswiss for ghcr
- backend: change all imports to bitboxswiss
- update appveyor yaml to use new org bitboxswiss

vendor: bitbox02-api-go

    go get github.com/BitBoxSwiss/bitbox02-api-go@b22740e514bcce2d01c92588d5890e9af8e4fbcb
    go mod tidy
    go mod vendor

vendor: block-client-go

    go get github.com/BitBoxSwiss/block-client-go@0d604acd65198ec3d3768d4691f95243aff71eab
    go mod tidy
    go mod vendor
@thisconnect
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ci passed with appveyor, squashing now....

@thisconnect thisconnect merged commit 27ebf6c into BitBoxSwiss:master May 16, 2024
5 checks passed
Beerosagos added a commit to Beerosagos/bitbox-wallet-app that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
testAccountsByKeystore test was occasionally failing the check on the
number of loaded accounts for each keystore
(see BitBoxSwiss#2716 (comment))

This fix excludes the `HiddenBecauseUnused` accounts from the check and
should fix the issue.
NicolaLS pushed a commit to NicolaLS/bitbox-wallet-app that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
testAccountsByKeystore test was occasionally failing the check on the
number of loaded accounts for each keystore
(see BitBoxSwiss#2716 (comment))

This fix excludes the `HiddenBecauseUnused` accounts from the check and
should fix the issue.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants