Pronunciations refactoring

[BoboTiG]

Fixes #1174.

I reviewed completely how pronunciations were retrieved in order to tackle that task, including changing where pronunciations were looked for: before we were using the whole word wikicode, now we only use head_sections wikicode (faster, and more efficient).

It has the following nice side-effects (on top the having local-specific formatting like \...\ for French, [...] for German, etc.):

• EN, FR: now supports multiple cross-sections pronunciations (like ones from Middle English combined to ones from Old English sections, for instance on English data)
• FR: pronunciations outside the French section are no more taken into account (like using values from Gaulois or other locale sections, that was incorrect)
• PT: a lot more pronunciations are correctly found now
• SV: multiple pronunciations are now supported
• RU: it will be way easier to tackle [RU] Decode pronunciations #1376 then

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.72%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	23.45 😞	22.85 😞	-0.60 👍
Method Length	132.36 😞	123.98 😞	-8.38 👍
Working memory	10.61 😞	10.57 😞	-0.04 👍
Quality	46.72% 😞	47.44% 😞	0.72% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	6190	6401	211

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
tests/test_2_render.py	89.42% ⭐	89.84% ⭐	0.42% 👍
tests/test_ca.py	61.41% 🙂	66.47% 🙂	5.06% 👍
tests/test_de.py	71.80% 🙂	74.87% 🙂	3.07% 👍
tests/test_el.py	74.94% 🙂	77.55% ⭐	2.61% 👍
tests/test_en.py	62.91% 🙂	67.56% 🙂	4.65% 👍
tests/test_es.py	61.46% 🙂	66.72% 🙂	5.26% 👍
tests/test_fr.py	53.21% 🙂	59.42% 🙂	6.21% 👍
tests/test_it.py	75.58% ⭐	78.42% ⭐	2.84% 👍
tests/test_pt.py	64.69% 🙂	69.22% 🙂	4.53% 👍
tests/test_ru.py	70.04% 🙂	73.68% 🙂	3.64% 👍
tests/test_sv.py	78.53% ⭐	81.28% ⭐	2.75% 👍
wikidict/find_templates.py	50.33% 🙂	51.18% 🙂	0.85% 👍
wikidict/render.py	38.63% 😞	37.74% 😞	-0.89% 👎
wikidict/stubs.py	75.97% ⭐	75.24% ⭐	-0.73% 👎
wikidict/utils.py	66.93% 🙂	66.95% 🙂	0.02% 👍
wikidict/lang/init.py	79.35% ⭐	79.80% ⭐	0.45% 👍
wikidict/lang/defaults.py	65.47% 🙂	64.99% 🙂	-0.48% 👎
wikidict/lang/ca/init.py	18.85% ⛔	19.26% ⛔	0.41% 👍
wikidict/lang/de/init.py	66.24% 🙂	64.95% 🙂	-1.29% 👎
wikidict/lang/el/init.py	74.98% 🙂	73.01% 🙂	-1.97% 👎
wikidict/lang/en/init.py	19.38% ⛔	23.96% ⛔	4.58% 👍
wikidict/lang/es/init.py	26.51% 😞	26.44% 😞	-0.07% 👎
wikidict/lang/fr/init.py	17.00% ⛔	20.62% ⛔	3.62% 👍
wikidict/lang/it/init.py	85.80% ⭐	83.75% ⭐	-2.05% 👎
wikidict/lang/no/init.py	94.23% ⭐	96.18% ⭐	1.95% 👍
wikidict/lang/pt/init.py	18.75% ⛔	19.01% ⛔	0.26% 👍
wikidict/lang/ru/init.py	89.37% ⭐	87.49% ⭐	-1.88% 👎
wikidict/lang/sv/init.py	48.99% 😞	48.90% 😞	-0.09% 👎

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
wikidict/lang/en/init.py	last_template_handler	63 ⛔	397 ⛔	25 ⛔	4.77% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
wikidict/lang/ca/init.py	last_template_handler	53 ⛔	479 ⛔		4.90% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods
wikidict/lang/pt/init.py	last_template_handler	58 ⛔	528 ⛔	22 ⛔	5.41% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
wikidict/lang/fr/init.py	last_template_handler	64 ⛔	573 ⛔	18 ⛔	7.19% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
wikidict/lang/es/init.py	last_template_handler	37 ⛔	294 ⛔	25 ⛔	12.13% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!