You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The RP2040 does not drive the ILI9225 based displays reliably. This has been traced to the ability of the RP2040 to output SPI data values with minimal gaps between bytes/words. The ILI9225 accepts high SPI rates but empirical evidence shows it requires a significant gap between command bytes and any 16 bit data values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have the ILI9225 working reliably with the RP2040. I had to use the slow Arduino SPI calls for command register accesses to get it working. Fortunately pixel data can still be sent with a minimal time gap between colour data words, so the graphics tests still return reasonable figures at 32.25MHz SPI clock rate:
The RP2040 does not drive the ILI9225 based displays reliably. This has been traced to the ability of the RP2040 to output SPI data values with minimal gaps between bytes/words. The ILI9225 accepts high SPI rates but empirical evidence shows it requires a significant gap between command bytes and any 16 bit data values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: