Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Billing page is unclear #388

Closed
derekantrican opened this issue Mar 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Billing page is unclear #388

derekantrican opened this issue Mar 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
@Komediruzecki
Labels
improvement request 🔨 Issue concerns an existing feature that needs improvement.
Projects
Dev kanban

Comments

@derekantrican
Copy link

Screenshot:

image

I'm assuming that the "Premium" column is supposed to have some of these boxes checked. Otherwise it seems like both the "Basic" and "Premium" versions have exactly the same features (other than cloud storage size)
@Flexo013
Copy link
Contributor

Currently both Basic and Premium have the same features (except for storage size).

I do agree that this overview could benefit from replacing the circles with checkmarks.

@Flexo013 Flexo013 changed the title Billing page doesn't show any "features" checked Billing page is unclear Mar 27, 2020
@Flexo013 Flexo013 transferred this issue from BoostIO/BoostNote-Legacy Mar 27, 2020
@Flexo013 Flexo013 added the improvement request 🔨 Issue concerns an existing feature that needs improvement. label Mar 27, 2020
@Rokt33r
Copy link
Member

Rokt33r commented Mar 27, 2020

Sounds good to me. I'll think about it. Thanks for sharing your idea.

@Rokt33r Rokt33r added this to To do (High) in Dev kanban Apr 9, 2020
Komediruzecki added a commit to Komediruzecki/BoostNote.next that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2020
@Komediruzecki
Add checkmarks instead of circles in billing page (BoostIO#388)
3ba16d1
Rokt33r pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2020
@Komediruzecki @Rokt33r
Add checkmarks instead of circles in billing page (#388)
cfdc170
@Komediruzecki Komediruzecki self-assigned this Nov 29, 2020
@Komediruzecki
Copy link
Contributor

This could be closed as we added checkmarks. But cannot find the 388 issue to put it in kanban board to done.

@Rokt33r can you look at it?

@Flexo013 Flexo013 moved this from To do (High) to Done in Dev kanban Nov 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Komediruzecki Komediruzecki

Labels
improvement request 🔨 Issue concerns an existing feature that needs improvement.
Projects
No open projects
Dev kanban
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@derekantrican @Flexo013 @Rokt33r @Komediruzecki