iterate objects with #each

[jeffrey-vella]

Currently #each only works if you have an array, so i am having to do a costly conversion:

http://jsfiddle.net/pixelhobo/E9dUm/

It would be much better you went over the key/value pairs of an object, something like this:

http://jsfiddle.net/pixelhobo/cfEnt/

[BorisMoore]

The behavior of {{#each dataExpression}} ... {{/each}} or {{each dataExpression tmpl="myTemplate"}} is to render the content of the template against the data returned by dataExpression.

If the data is an array, it iterates for each item - which becomes the current dataItem for that rendered template (view) - and concatenates the result. But if dataExpression returns a single object, then it renders just once, with that object as current data item.

If you don't pass any data at all, as in {{each tmpl="myTemplate"}} then it will render the template just once, keeping the current dataItem from the outer scope.

I am considering changing the name of the tag from each to {{for}} to make less surprising that it does not iterate when you pass it a singleton.

It is not a common scenario to render the same template against each of the properties of an object. Usually you know, statically, the properties of the object, and can do

{{#each propertiesObject }}
    Created Date: {{=createdDat}} 
    Created By: {{=createdBy}} 
{{/each}}

If you want to apply the same template to each property, as an iteration over all the properties, you can provide a helper function to return the array, rather than add a new array to your data, as in {{#each $ctx.propertyArray(properties)}}...{{/each}}

See also this comment on my blog

[BorisMoore]

See also #49

[quasipickle]

My apologies for necro-posting, but I wanted to provide an example of why someone might want to iterate through the properties of an object.

In a nutshell, for the purposes of data-linking, an array/collection does not allow (or very easily allow) for changing just one property of one entry.

Take this data:

inout = {
    joe:{
        name:  'Joe',
        status: 'out'},
    jane:{
        name: 'Jane',
        status:'in'},
    jill:{
        name:'Jill',
        status:'away'}
}

And I render it like so:
$("#domElement").link(inout,"#templateID");

I could then update a particular person like
$.observable(inout).setProperty({joe:{status:'in'}});

I think - I haven't tested this, but looking through the source, I'm guessing this is how it works

By only being able to iterate over arrays, I either need to

1. Re-generate the entire array server side (assuming the change is triggering an ajax request to save in a DB or something), or
2. Convert the inout object to an array, and keep a mapping of people to array index, so I can update the property like so:
   var index = nameToNameMap['joe'];
$.observable(inout).setProperty({index:{status:'in'}});

Is there another way to approach this?

[BorisMoore]

I agree there are scenarios where this is useful. I hope to be able to look into supporting it...

[RobinDaugherty]

Can we reopen this issue then please? It's definitely necessary, and the original poster closed the ticket for some reason.

[BorisMoore]

I may provide built-in support for this in the future, but already it is quite easy to address this scenario using a custom helper function or tag. I have added a sample to show how to do that. (Code here)

[RobinDaugherty]

That looks perfect. Thanks!

[stewartlord]

Any chance of reopening this issue? It took me a while to figure out hashes are not supported by {{for}}. Cool that you can do it via custom helpers, but this seems rather fundamental.

[BorisMoore]

OK, makes sense. Reopening as a feature request for built-in support.

[BorisMoore]

This feature is now supported, using the new {{props}} tag.
https://github.com/BorisMoore/jsrender/blob/master/demos/scenarios/03_iterating-through-fields-scenario.html
http://borismoore.github.io/jsrender/demos/scenarios/03_iterating-through-fields-scenario.html
#218

{{props details}}
        <div>
                <b>{{>key}}</b>: {{>prop}}
        </div>
{{/props}}