Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gpg - sign only & import encypted mails ? #20

Open
ka7 opened this issue May 21, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

gpg - sign only & import encypted mails ? #20

ka7 opened this issue May 21, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@ka7
Copy link

ka7 commented May 21, 2017

I don't need encryption, but signing ( via pgp ) the mail would be beneficial.
( not secret, but authentic sender )

and/or: if the incoming emails are pgp-encrypted, to be processed.
some servers are outside and provide status (updates needed) via email to redmine.
having that encrypted might be cool.

@timegrid
Copy link
Member

@ sign only
What would be the usecase exactly? If users (including bots) are capable of signing/validating mails, they are also capable of en-/decrypting them. The only difference I see is that users don't need to provide the passphrase for received mails (although passhrase is needed to send signed mails). I don't see, why you should drop encryption, even if not needed explicitly.

@ import encrypted mails
If those status mails would be an encrypted mail response to a ticket, and are piped into the rdm_mailhandler, it should work fine right now. Probably I don't get your point, could you elaborate?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants