-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dealing with derived volumes in harmonization #189
Conversation
@AbdulkadirA I included the dataset/model used to make checks on this PR. The model, in particular, is useful because it includes derived harmonized volumes in the key model['ROIs']. I have saved them to my comp_space found here:
|
@AbdulkadirA also, make sure any istaging dataset you match with |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@melhemr Thanks. Please use logger.info()
instead of print()
for better control.
The issue with overstepping bounds is resolved. |
1c2be18
to
f6d79c7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@melhemr Thanks. Just a small detail. There should be no line break in the log message. If you want display multiple lines, please use logger.info()
repeatedly.
f6d79c7
to
15b3a2d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@melhemr Thanks.
This PR handles cases in which DERIVED ROI volumes are included in the harmonization model. It also fixes a bug that has to do with age limits in harmonization