Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: in sharding mode, merge result miss some rows #214

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 29, 2022

Conversation

dk-lockdown
Copy link
Collaborator

ref: https://github.com/cectc/dbpack/issues/

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@dk-lockdown dk-lockdown added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 28, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 28, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #214 (d5ea92a) into dev (7d71429) will decrease coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 78.57%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #214      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   42.14%   41.98%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          82       82              
  Lines        9807     9805       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         4133     4117      -16     
- Misses       5251     5262      +11     
- Partials      423      426       +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/executor/sharding.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/plan/result.go 60.65% <91.66%> (-3.15%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us.

@dk-lockdown dk-lockdown merged commit 1aebf5c into CECTC:dev Jul 29, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 29, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants